Are Public Firms Actually Buying Bitcoin Or Just Diluting Shares?
Satsuma Technology, a British Bitcoin treasury firm, concluded a $217 million fundraising round today. More than half of these funds, however, consisted of direct BTC donations, which Satsuma exchanged for company stock.
By avoiding the open market, these trades become difficult to measure through BTC demand and may dilute retail investors’ own shares. It’s unknown how many companies engage in the practice, but it could introduce market instability.
Treasury Firm Trades Bitcoin for Shares
Companies around the world are building massive Bitcoin treasuries, led by firms like Strategy, which are fiercely committed to the plan.
However, a growing rumor in the community suggests that many of these firms aren’t actually buying BTC in the way investors assume. Instead, they may be acquiring it through direct trades.
Earlier today, Satsuma Technology, a British firm, announced a $217 million fundraising round to fuel a Bitcoin treasury.
However, a closer look at company documents reveals a more complicated story. The majority of this fundraising round, $128 million, consisted of direct BTC donations. In other words, fiat currency didn’t change hands in these deals.
Could This Dilute Retail Holdings?
So, why would this matter to the crypto market? Essentially, most companies with Bitcoin treasuries are trading at significant premiums to their net BTC assets.
Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy), Metaplanet, and GameStop have raised billions through stock dilution to buy Bitcoin, inflating BTC-per-share while eroding equity value.
But what if these companies didn’t need to buy BTC on the open market? Building these corporate treasuries might not increase the demand for Bitcoin.
Moreover, the process is very opaque, leading some to compare it to premined tokens. If these companies offer a discount for shares purchased in this manner, it could dilute retail investors’ holdings.
The lack of transparency is at the heart of the issue here. To be clear, Satsuma’s press release didn’t directly claim that it traded shares at a discount for Bitcoin. That will retroactively be true if the share prices go up soon, since retail investors didn’t have access to this fundraising round.
Nonetheless, this is a case of clever financial engineering. The situation is very ambiguous, and it’s hard to make definitive claims without more information.
Investors seem less concerned with earnings or fundamentals and more with a new benchmark—BTC-per-share yield. Companies that can increase the amount of Bitcoin backing each share often see their stock outperform peers.
It’s a feedback loop: raise capital, buy BTC, increase BTC/share, watch the stock climb, repeat.
However, this only works in a rising BTC market. If Bitcoin corrects sharply, these same companies could face significant equity drawdowns, while shareholders are left holding diluted stock and paper losses.
Overall, there is a lot of misunderstanding about how quickly some companies raise capital and deploy it into BTC, creating the appearance of “instant” BTC ownership. But the dilution is real, and clearly documented in regulatory filings.
Disclaimer
In adherence to the Trust Project guidelines, BeInCrypto is committed to unbiased, transparent reporting. This news article aims to provide accurate, timely information. However, readers are advised to verify facts independently and consult with a professional before making any decisions based on this content. Please note that our Terms and Conditions, Privacy Policy, and Disclaimers have been updated.
